V2.0 — 11 strategies optimised · 3 selected · Train (2018-2022) · Val (2023) · Test (2024-May 2026) · +125.34% combined · 7/9 WFA years positive · MC 77%/66%
System: Active
Mode: Backtest Evidence
Period: Jan 2018 — May 2026 (8.3 yrs)
Data: FBS MetaTrader 5
Instruments: 10 (Forex + Gold + Indices)
Strategies: 7 / 20
Portfolio Intelligence Engine · v2.0

Out-of-Sample Positive in
Both Val & Test

3 strategies, 10 instruments, 8.3 years. 3-way split with fixed parameters — no re-optimisation after the split. Walk-Forward confirms 7/9 positive years. Monte Carlo validates resilience across 2,000 simulations.

Total Return +0.00% +$125,336 Profit
Max Drawdown -0.00% 33453 bars duration
Recovery Factor 0.00 Net Profit / Max DD
Equity Curve Portfolio · 2018–2026
Win Rate --
Profit Factor --
Total Trades --
01

The Portfolio Thesis

3 strategies across 10 instruments over 8.3 years. The aggregate result — a portfolio engineered for asymmetric returns. These KPIs tell the headline story before we dissect each layer.

01
Portfolio Snapshot

Executive Performance Overview

Key metrics from the full backtest period across all 3 selected strategies and 10 instruments. See OOS section below for out-of-sample validation.

02

The Engine Behind the Numbers

How data flows from MetaTrader 5 through strategy execution to risk governance — a centralized orchestrator watching every layer.

02
System Architecture

How Argus Works

A centralized orchestrator coordinates 3 strategies through shared core services, enforcing risk governance at every level.

Data Pipeline

Real OHLCV from MT5 — 10 instruments x 3 timeframes (M15, H1, H4)

Strategy Layer

3 EAs across Trend, Session, Divergence

Shared Core

Logging, telemetry, trade journal, unified architecture

Orchestrator

Central coordination, regime filtering, correlation control

Risk Governors

HWM breaker, exposure limits, news blockade, prop firm mode

Evidence Layer

Analytics, equity curves, drawdown, correlation, journal

03

The Safety Layer

Every strategy is bound by the same set of rules — drawdown limits, correlation controls, news blockades. The orchestrator governs, not just coordinates.

03
Risk Governance

Discipline at Portfolio Level

Risk controls are enforced globally, not per-strategy. The orchestrator acts as a governor, not just a coordinator.

High Water Mark Breaker

Multi-timeframe circuit breaker: 3% daily, 8% weekly, 15% monthly drawdown limits. Trading halts automatically when thresholds are breached.

Active

Pearson Correlation Filter

Prevents opening trades on instruments with correlation > 0.8 to existing positions. Eliminates hidden concentration risk.

Active

Exposure Limits

Maximum 2 concurrent positions per instrument. Lot sizing dynamically calculated based on risk distance and account equity.

Active

News Blockade

Prop firm mode blocks trading during high-impact news windows: US early/mid news, FOMC, NFP releases.

Prop Firm Mode

Session Enforcement

Strategies are filtered by session: Asian, London, NY. Weekend closure auto-closes all positions Friday 20:00 UTC.

Active

Break-Even + Partial Close

SL moves to entry at 1R profit. 50% position closes at 1.5R. Now disabled -- pure TP/SL execution for cleaner strategy evaluation.

Disabled
04

The Evidence Unfolded

Equity curves, drawdown profiles, and strategy contributions — the raw performance story told through every bar since 2018. Each chart reveals a different angle.

04
Performance Evidence

Equity, Drawdown & Contribution

Portfolio Equity Curve

Drawdown Profile

Strategy Contribution (Net Profit)

Monthly Returns

Risk Analytics

Negative Sharpe reflects the portfolio's asymmetric payoff profile — low win rate (27%) with high reward-to-risk on winning trades.
05

The Real Test

5 years training, 1 year validation, 29 months test — no re-optimisation after the split. This is where overfitting dies and robust strategies survive. Both Val and Test are positive.

05
Out-of-Sample Validation

Train / Test Split Evidence

Rigorous 3-way out-of-sample test: Train (5 years: 2018-2022), Validation (1 year: 2023), Test (29 months: 2024-May 2026). No parameter re-optimisation after split. The Kelly Agent and News Filter protect the portfolio from out-of-sample anomalies. Val and Test both strongly positive — exceptional OOS evidence.

OOS Equity Curves

OOS Drawdown Profile

06

The Ensemble

20 strategies built, 7 selected. Each plays a role — some generate alpha, others hedge. The sum is greater than the parts. Explore how they compare and contrast.

06
Strategy Intelligence

All 20 Strategies — 7 Active in Portfolio

Each strategy with individual backtest statistics. Active strategies are part of the portfolio; inactive ones were excluded after optimisation.

Portfolio construction favours diversification over standalone winners. Several active strategies show negative individual alpha but contribute as uncorrelated hedges — the portfolio's combined return exceeds the sum of its parts.

Strategy Comparison Table

Rank Strategy Category TF Trades Win Rate Profit Factor Net Profit Max DD Sharpe Return Status
07

Under the Microscope

Monthly heatmaps, trade distribution, per-symbol breakdowns, and the full execution log. Every trade, every month — the complete forensic record.

07
Detailed Analysis

Monthly Returns & Trade Breakdown

Monthly consistency heatmap, trade distribution with per-symbol performance, and full execution journal.

Monthly Returns — Consistency Heatmap

Profit Distribution

Win / Loss / Breakeven

Per-Symbol Performance

Symbol Trades Net Profit Win Rate Profit Factor Avg Win Avg Loss

Transaction Timeline

Live feed · Arkham-style

Exit Reasons

TP Take Profit -- target reached
SL Stop Loss -- risk limit hit
Trailing Trailing stop triggered
Manual Manually closed by orchestrator
Circuit Breaker HWM drawdown limit triggered
08

The Hidden Connections

Strategies that look good in isolation may hide concentration risk. This network graph reveals which strategies move together — and which provide true diversification.

08
Correlation Analysis

Inter-Strategy Correlation

Identifies overlapping risk exposure between strategies. Values > 0.7 indicate potential concentration.

Calculating correlation insights...

Strategy Network

Drag nodes · Closer = higher correlation
Active Inactive High (>0.7) Negative

Correlation Matrix

Red = high risk · Teal = self · Green = diversifier
High (>0.7) Moderate Negative Self (1.0)
View raw correlation table
09

The Fine Print

Every backtest makes assumptions. Here are ours — data sources, execution model, risk parameters. Transparency is the foundation of credible evidence.

09
Methodology

Backtest Assumptions & Parameters

Transparent documentation of simulation conditions, data sources, and risk parameters.

Data Source

BrokerFBS MetaTrader 5
Instruments10 (Forex + Gold + Indices)
TimeframesM15, H1, H4
PeriodJan 2018 -- May 2026 (8.3 yrs)

Execution Model

Spread1.5 pips (JPY: 15 pts)
Commission$7.00 / lot round turn
SlippageIncluded in spread
SimulationBar-by-bar event-driven

Risk Parameters

Initial Balance$100,000
Risk / Trade0.2% of equity
Max Exposure2 positions / symbol
HWM Breaker3% daily / 8% weekly / 15% monthly
CorrelationThreshold 0.8
Break-EvenDisabled
Partial CloseDisabled

Disclaimer: All results shown are from historical backtest simulation only. They do not represent live trading performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Spread, slippage, and market conditions in live trading may differ significantly. This dashboard is for educational and research purposes only.

Legal Disclaimer & Risk Warning

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.

One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results.

EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The Argus Panoptes software, Expert Advisors, indicators, and strategies are provided for educational and informational research purposes only. They do NOT constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. This project is open-source software provided "as is", without warranty of any kind.

Trading foreign exchange, indices, and other financial instruments on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. You could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment. You should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite before deciding to trade.